On 05/28/2009 01:06 PM, Simon Wesp wrote:
Michael Fleming<mfleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrotes: MF> Hm. interesting case. MF> I've got no problem with it. Unlike hot-babe there's nothing even MF> remotely resembling depiction here. personally I am torn between 'go' and 'no-go' the guidelines says: "Content must not be pornographic, or contain nudity, whether animated, simulated, or photographed. There are better places on the Internet to get porn." my pro: this package is free of pornographic content. hotbabe isn't free of this content.
Why quote the guidline if it clearly doesn't apply in this case?
my contra: it helps you to get this stuff. An instigator for a murder is guilty like the murderer himself!
Murder is a crime, pornography isn't so this comparison doesn't make much sense. Also Firefox helps you to "get this stuff" too so if that's a reason for banning this package then you'd have to ban a lot of other software from Fedora too.
I don't see much of a controversy here. The package doesn't try to deceive anyone about it's intentions and doesn't contain any objectionable material itself.
Regards, Dennis -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
