Re: gnaughty is a hot babe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 28 May 2009 15:13:32 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Hi
> 
> My packaging survey turned up a interesting suggestion
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-May/msg01809.html
> 
> We don't currently have any guidelines covering this but considering
> the Debian action to hot babe
> 
> http://lwn.net/Articles/113644/
> 
> I wanted to asked first,  is this allowed in Fedora?
> 

Hm. interesting case.

I've got no problem with it. Unlike hot-babe there's nothing even
remotely resembling depiction here.

It's essentially a download tool a la aria2/d4x/gwget with a particular
focus/niche and in my opinion fairly innocuous. The author is pretty
up-front about what it is and what it's for - if that's reflected in
the %description then the odds on it being installed "accidentally"
would be fairly low.

> Rahul
> 

Michael "It's only kinky the first time you rpm -i it" Fleming


-- 
Michael Fleming <mfleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - (EMail/XMPP/Jabber)
WWW: http://www.thatfleminggent.com
Fedora / Red Hat Packages: http://www.thatfleminggent.com/rpm-packages
Twitter: http://twitter.com/thatfleminggent 

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux