On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Simo Sorce <ssorce@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:02 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: >> >> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> >> > On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: >> >>> The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group >> >>> in graphical installers >> >> >> >> although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe >> >> because they are merged! >> >> I guess there is an option for hidden groups >> >> >> > >> > Have these packages: >> > >> > Provides: policy(adult content) >> > >> > And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has: >> > >> > Conflicts: policy(adult content) >> > >> > /me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate. >> >> Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not. >> >> Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all over >> the distro and diluting the value of the tag. >> >> Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a provides >> tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this way then >> I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to: >> >> - firefox >> - yum >> - sword >> - gnome-sword > > yum ? it can be used to download/install packages with such content. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
