On 05/29/2009 08:02 AM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: >>>> The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group >>>> in graphical installers >>> >>> although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe >>> because they are merged! >>> I guess there is an option for hidden groups >>> >> >> Have these packages: >> >> Provides: policy(adult content) >> >> And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has: >> >> Conflicts: policy(adult content) >> >> /me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate. > > Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not. > > Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all > over the distro and diluting the value of the tag. > What about policy(shows skin) ? > Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a > provides tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this > way then I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to: > > - firefox > - yum > - sword > - gnome-sword > sword and gnome-sword could certainly get policy(religious) firefox could have: policy(the internet is for p0rn) and yum: policy(ad absurdium) -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
