On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:35 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: >> Why do we not force updates to Fedora X to always be N-V-R older than >> Fedora X+1? We can use the Release tag to enforce this within a >> Version, and newer Versions shouldn't appear in older Fedora's until >> they've been in the newer Fedora first. > > Your suggest would lead to not allowing F10's package versions to /ever/ > be newer than what Fedora 11 ships with at GA. > Question! Why not force them to be "N-V" older, then? Wouldn't that still allow for security updates? (I assumed security updates were the minor-point-number -R packages). So in essence, the F9 packages are set in stone when F10 is released, except for minor patches. No new versions. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
