On Mon, 11 May 2009, Jud Craft wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:35 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Why do we not force updates to Fedora X to always be N-V-R older than
Fedora X+1? We can use the Release tag to enforce this within a
Version, and newer Versions shouldn't appear in older Fedora's until
they've been in the newer Fedora first.
Your suggest would lead to not allowing F10's package versions to /ever/
be newer than what Fedora 11 ships with at GA.
Question!
Why not force them to be "N-V" older, then? Wouldn't that still allow
for security updates? (I assumed security updates were the
minor-point-number -R packages).
So in essence, the F9 packages are set in stone when F10 is released,
except for minor patches. No new versions.
Security patches are not uncommonly just patches and therefore just a
release update.
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
