On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:22:03AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > Well, I see it as a well defined *targeted product* which happens to > > be composed of packages. It's the base from which other things can be > > installed from the Internet. What is the problem with "static pile of > > packages"? (I have to admit to only skimming this thread) > > Updates to the previous release will quickly become N-V-R "newer" than > the static pile of packages, which renders your upgrade a bit... odd. Why do we not force updates to Fedora X to always be N-V-R older than Fedora X+1? We can use the Release tag to enforce this within a Version, and newer Versions shouldn't appear in older Fedora's until they've been in the newer Fedora first. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
