Re: 182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:57:34AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:35 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > Why do we not force updates to Fedora X to always be N-V-R older than 
> > Fedora X+1?  We can use the Release tag to enforce this within a 
> > Version, and newer Versions shouldn't appear in older Fedora's until 
> > they've been in the newer Fedora first.
> 
> "until they've been in the newer Fedora first" doesn't work with the
> newer fedora release media is a static pile of packages.
> 
> Your suggest would lead to not allowing F10's package versions to /ever/
> be newer than what Fedora 11 ships with at GA.

I guess epochs are the only way to solve that then.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux