Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christian Rose wrote:
IMHO, Fedora needs more maintainers who think of whole releases as
stable release sets.
"Stable release sets" doesn't mean "no updates", it means "no updates which
break things".
Normally, 3.0->3.1 type upgrades aren't the kind of updates which cause
regressions or compatibility issues.
+1
I fully agreed. Fedora is a bleeding edge distro. It is why I love it.
It sometimes got trouble, but it is. If we have distro with other policy
- please, RHEL, CentOS have it absolutely different - no updates until
it absolutely needed.
So, if 3.0 -> 3.1 update do not promise serious troubles - I want see it
in Fedora 10.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
