On 5/9/09, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 12:51 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > Well, in this case updating F-10 3.1 properly would require updating a > > load of other stuff as well with all the risks and work that entails. > > But even if that wasn't the case I generally don't bump major versions > > of OOo in a released product. I see our fedora release cycle as ones of > > iterative stable complete releases, rather than one which has an > > always-open pool of stable packages which always contains the latest > > stable version of a package. i.e. F-10 was history as soon as it was > > released, and F-11 is likewise almost dead to me already :-) Not that I > > won't fix bugs in them, just that I don't see them as live development > > releases. > > I thank you for this! +1 IMHO, Fedora needs more maintainers who think of whole releases as stable release sets. Christian -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
