On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 12:51 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > Well, in this case updating F-10 3.1 properly would require updating a > load of other stuff as well with all the risks and work that entails. > But even if that wasn't the case I generally don't bump major versions > of OOo in a released product. I see our fedora release cycle as ones of > iterative stable complete releases, rather than one which has an > always-open pool of stable packages which always contains the latest > stable version of a package. i.e. F-10 was history as soon as it was > released, and F-11 is likewise almost dead to me already :-) Not that I > won't fix bugs in them, just that I don't see them as live development > releases. I thank you for this! -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
