On 05/09/2009 11:28 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 12:51 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Well, in this case updating F-10 3.1 properly would require updating a
load of other stuff as well with all the risks and work that entails.
But even if that wasn't the case I generally don't bump major versions
of OOo in a released product. I see our fedora release cycle as ones of
iterative stable complete releases, rather than one which has an
always-open pool of stable packages which always contains the latest
stable version of a package. i.e. F-10 was history as soon as it was
released, and F-11 is likewise almost dead to me already :-) Not that I
won't fix bugs in them, just that I don't see them as live development
releases.
I thank you for this!
-2 - I dont thank you at all.
That is silly. We are happy to have kernel updates, and a minor but
useful openoffice update is hardly a huge risk ... put it in testing
and let people see if any issues arise - i'd be happy to try it from
testing.
I might agree that we shud leave openoffice 4.1 for fedora 12 ...
but 3.0 to 3.1 .. sighs ...
g/
|
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
