Re: Update -> b0rken eclipse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/5/10 Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> * Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-05-09 18:26]:
>>
>> But meanwhile I tried using the Native version (which didn't work right
>
> We don't ship gcj .so files anymore and haven't for a while so it's not
> really "the Native version" :)  Unless you mean "the packaged version".
>
>> until recently), and after some pain (the Software Updates... feature
>> is just horrible!) I managed to get WTP (Web Tools Project installed)
>> and make it usable.
>
> How is the Update Manager any better in upstream's version?  We do not
> differ at all.

I think the issue he is reffering to is that when you use the upstream
version and install in your home folder for example all updates/addons
are installed into that folder too and all works as expected but if
you use the fedora version the rpm versions are installed in system
and addons from update center are installed in home folder. result is
that it is difficult to update addons that are rpm installed and
combined with strict version dependencies from other addons it makes
it difficult if not impossible to install some additional addons.
Having said that I havent really had many issues like that recently.

-- 
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary
and those who don't...

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux