On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 00:20 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > But meanwhile I tried using the Native version (which didn't work > right > > We don't ship gcj .so files anymore and haven't for a while so it's > not really "the Native version" :) Unless you mean "the packaged > version". OK, "the packaged version" than it is :) It's hard to tell if there are .so files or not... > > until recently), and after some pain (the Software Updates... > feature > is just horrible!) I managed to get WTP (Web Tools Project > installed) > and make it usable. > > How is the Update Manager any better in upstream's version? We do not > differ at all. You are right, it's not different -- it was just a small rant that was out of context. Eclipse is an amazing application, and it sets a very high bar, but that particular part is very poorly though out from a usability perspective. To add insult to injury, it might be worse with the packaged version due to the fact that some components are fixed. But that's conjecture, all I know it's been painful. I'll detail why in a different message. -- Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> Lattica, Inc. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
