Re: 182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For new packages, it's surely better to have a new crap package than
> no package at all.

When a package claims to do something but is actually no good at it, it
can cause real frustration to those who just want to use the computer
and not develop for it.

I would much rather the software that goes into a Fedora release be of
release quality, starting from the time the package review is finished,
or not be in it at all.

Is it just me?

Tim.
*/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux