On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 18:29 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Yes, this is a problem, a rogue package that has 'Provides: glibc', > but I tend to think this is a problem with RPM or Fedora itself, which > should (somehow!) prevent that. In the future, we could be running post-build tests that would catch something like this and prevent the build from being tagged without maintainer forcing it. However we don't have that right now, so suggestions on how to accomplish your goal with today's resources? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
