On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:20 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 10:41 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > No, I think he may have been suggesting that the old "line in the sand" > > > might be a good starting point for such differentiation. > > > > Right on the "spot" :-) > > Unfortunately that line was pretty darn arbitrary, and nobody has put > forth a serious effort to draw a real logical line. We were kicking around, in QA, using the same definition currently used for release-critical bugs: anything that can feasibly stop the system booting, stop X working, stop networking working, or stop you being able to update the system (i.e. yum+dependencies) would be 'core'. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
