On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:50 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 13:31 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 22:09 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 10:41:37AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > How is it we have 182 stable updates pending for F11 already? How have > > > > these seen any testing by a wider audience? Are we really just not > > > > bothering with updates-testing anymore? Do we not care about distro > > > > stability? > > > > > > I'll tell you the three reasons I'm pushing stuff directly to stable: > > > > > > (1) New package. > > > > > > (2) Update to a new package that I know not many people are using. > > > > This (2) is something we should try and figure out, IMHO. Trying to > > apply the same rules and guidelines to 8k+ packages doesn't work. > > > > There is a large set of packages which always should spend some time in > > updates-testing, but there's an even larger set of packages which it > > probably doesn't help at all. The same goes for the pre-GA development > > freeze. > > Fedora Core vs Fedora Extras ... Your point? That because we've merged Core and Extras we should never differentiate between packages based on "coreness" for anything ever again? Cheers, Mark. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
