On Fri, 8 May 2009, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:50 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 13:31 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 22:09 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 10:41:37AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
How is it we have 182 stable updates pending for F11 already? How have
these seen any testing by a wider audience? Are we really just not
bothering with updates-testing anymore? Do we not care about distro
stability?
I'll tell you the three reasons I'm pushing stuff directly to stable:
(1) New package.
(2) Update to a new package that I know not many people are using.
This (2) is something we should try and figure out, IMHO. Trying to
apply the same rules and guidelines to 8k+ packages doesn't work.
There is a large set of packages which always should spend some time in
updates-testing, but there's an even larger set of packages which it
probably doesn't help at all. The same goes for the pre-GA development
freeze.
Fedora Core vs Fedora Extras ...
Your point?
That because we've merged Core and Extras we should never differentiate
between packages based on "coreness" for anything ever again?
I think we shouldn't differentiate on 'coreness' b/c of how arbitrary
that distinction is.
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
