Re: 182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/08/2009 09:44 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> For new packages, it's surely better to have a new crap package than
>> no package at all.
> 
> When a package claims to do something but is actually no good at it, it
> can cause real frustration to those who just want to use the computer
> and not develop for it.
> 
> I would much rather the software that goes into a Fedora release be of
> release quality, starting from the time the package review is finished,
> or not be in it at all.
> 
> Is it just me?

Not just you.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux