On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:14:08PM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > For new packages, it's surely better to have a new crap package than > > no package at all. > > When a package claims to do something but is actually no good at it, it > can cause real frustration to those who just want to use the computer > and not develop for it. > > I would much rather the software that goes into a Fedora release be of > release quality, starting from the time the package review is finished, > or not be in it at all. > > Is it just me? > I think there should be enough trust in the packagers to make the decision as to whether or not a "new" package is ready or not for consumption. Ray -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
