Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Are you coming up with your own definition of non-free? > "Free sources": Legal to copy, reuse and modify. This is far from a comprehensive definition. In your next mail, you talk about "artistic rights" which means you *are* differentiating data and programs. So I will ask you again, have you looked into the games packages which already have similar content? Have you read the OFL or Vera license? Do you see the similarity between what you object to within the game data and the font license? For say jpeg, would you insist on the SVG being available if that was the original source? What about the "source" of fonts? You can take it to any extreme you want. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
