Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Spot is the Red Hat Legal spokesperson. He is the one having the final
say around here and is the person I am considering to be responsible for
processing legal requests.
Did you even bother to read the link?
Yes, ... and?
Answers from "legal" are a matter of "how to ask questions" - IMO, they
all failed.
Considering that you actually think binaries not available freely is the
same as non-free, I will take FSF and Red Hat Legal's opinion over
yours. Also if you consider that game content as non-free you might want
to look closely at so much of the other content licenses such as Vera or
OFL. Atleast, then you would have a consistent stand point.
Where am I inconsistent?
I say Fedora is inconsiseent: These sound files, images, etc. are not
free and qualify Fedora as "non-free". Fedora's separation between
"data" and "programs" is absurd.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
