Ralf Corsepius wrote: > I say Fedora is inconsiseent: These sound files, images, etc. are not > free and qualify Fedora as "non-free". Fedora's separation between > "data" and "programs" is absurd. So all OFL and Vera licensed fonts are non-free? Every group that I know of including FSF and Debian differentiate between data and content. At times, it is a gray area but is hardly absurd. Here is the FSF guidelines: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html Are you coming up with your own definition of non-free? Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
