Le Mar 7 avril 2009 16:07, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : > > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> >> So please do not drag Fedora fonts in your argument. > > Why not? OFL has similar requirements about not selling it as > separately > as the game data requirements that Ralf objects to. I don't think the level of separation is the same. OFL says "with any software", without qualifying the software complexity (a court would probably agree a 3-line script is "software"). Vera says "a larger software package" but the people in charge published a clarification that a simple standalone package meets the requirements. This license says "as part of a larger & possibly commercial software distribution (such as a Linux distribution or magazine coverdisk)" This seems a much higher bar to meet to me. A linux distro or magazine coverdisk is usually hundreds of megs of other stuff if not more. However IIRC we have some non-modifiable "content" in the distro, which is clearly not free at all. This would have been a better example to take IMHO. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
