On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> The Fedora bug flow is defined here: > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow > >> Although it is lacking clear guidelines on the choice of sub-state for >> the CLOSED state. That just requires a little docs work on the wiki. > > Well, the choice of sub-state is exactly what's being debated here. > I think it's more than a "missing docs" problem, since (1) it's not > clear that we have a consensus, and (2) bodhi doesn't read docs. > Whatever we settle on will have to be implemented in bodhi. > > Another thing that would be nice is to get bugzilla to show a link > to this page instead of the RHEL one when looking at a Fedora bug. > > BTW, I notice that this diagram seems to treat NEEDINFO as an > independent state, which is no longer true --- it's just a flag now. > > regards, tom lane Tom, There should be a new version soon, it was brought up in IRC a while ago, and the task was assigned today in the Bugzappers meeting. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
