On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:57:10AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:24 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Chuck Anderson wrote: > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html > > > > > > How did you find that? I was looking for it, but couldn't find it > > > linked from anywhere. > > > > It's linked, at least, in the word "Status" at the bottom of each bug, > > next to the drop-down where you would set the status. [snip] > Possibly the clearest thing to do would just be to use the same flow > RHEL uses, even if the names would be a bit odd for Fedora (since we > don't really have 'Errata' for Fedora releases). Otherwise, the Fedora > flow should at least be clearly defined somewhere, and explained on that > page in Bugzilla. The Fedora bug flow is defined here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow Although it is lacking clear guidelines on the choice of sub-state for the CLOSED state. That just requires a little docs work on the wiki. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
