"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The Fedora bug flow is defined here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow > Although it is lacking clear guidelines on the choice of sub-state for > the CLOSED state. That just requires a little docs work on the wiki. Well, the choice of sub-state is exactly what's being debated here. I think it's more than a "missing docs" problem, since (1) it's not clear that we have a consensus, and (2) bodhi doesn't read docs. Whatever we settle on will have to be implemented in bodhi. Another thing that would be nice is to get bugzilla to show a link to this page instead of the RHEL one when looking at a Fedora bug. BTW, I notice that this diagram seems to treat NEEDINFO as an independent state, which is no longer true --- it's just a flag now. regards, tom lane -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
