On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:41:54PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 18:02 -0400, Matthew D Truch wrote: > > Without that, > > rpm would have just done the libcfitsio.so.0 dependancy (but cfitsio > > people don't bump the soname every time). > > They don't want to soname bump, but they want to forcefully require the > exact same version compiled against is used? Have you hit them with > something heavy lately? Tell me about it. They like to be "old school" or something like that. I guess it's on me (the cfitsio Fedora packager) to deal. -- "In space, no one can hear you scream." -------------------------- Matthew Truch Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Pennsylvania matt@xxxxxxxxx http://matt.truch.net/
Attachment:
pgpCf9N65qEb6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
