On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:01:35AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > They don't want to soname bump, but they want to forcefully require the > > exact same version compiled against is used? Have you hit them with > > something heavy lately? > > I think it's actually kst-fits which explicitly checks the version (and > should probably be patched not to do that). I haven't seen this sort of > problems with other cfitsio-using stuff. No, kst-fits doesn't check. cfitsio does it itself. I just double checked by compiling a test program (which just opened a fits file or two); on the first call to a cfitsio function when I have a binary compiled against a different version of the resident cfitsio library cfitsio errors out with the following text: ERROR: Mismatch in the version of the fitsio.h include file used to build the CFITSIO library, and the version included by the application program: Version used to build the CFITSIO library = 3.100000 Version included by the application program = 3.130000 FITSIO status = 104: could not open the named file CCFits ran into this problem a while back. I think most programs haven't been hit because cfitsio is updated relatively rarely. But I'm not 100% positive. -- "One in every seven days is a Thursday." -------------------------- Matthew Truch Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Pennsylvania matt@xxxxxxxxx http://matt.truch.net/
Attachment:
pgpiKHmxVHbfY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list