Re: Ready for new RPM version?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 18:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:

> So, you worked around the issue successfully. There you go. :)

I limped around it. To manage the amount of email I get I use lots of
vfolders. Evo broke for vfolders and vfolders of vfolders.

to be clear, it is STILL broken.


> 
> But, why was Evo so broken? This seems odd. As I mentioned, my previous
> distro packages pre-releases of GNOME and Evolution, and I run
> Evolution. I certainly don't think Evolution was broken for a
> significant period around August-October last year. I feel sure I
> would've remembered.

Then clearly you don't really USE evolution.




> Perhaps this is a case where, if there were more people running Rawhide
> - like, fr'instance, whoever packages Evolution - it would've got fixed
> faster...

No. It's broken upstream too.


> I suspect Rawhide is not as bad as many people think it is, and I
> further suspect it could be even better if more people ran it. Is that
> clearer? :)
> 

Not really.

I would like you to do this. Draft your thoughts for and about rawhide.
Write them up in the wiki and then post a short summary of those
thoughts to fedora-devel-list linking to the points in the wiki.

Try to be concise and brief.

Your emails are a bit scattered and I don't think you're improving the
situation by your current plan of attack.

-sv


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux