On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 18:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > So, you worked around the issue successfully. There you go. :) I limped around it. To manage the amount of email I get I use lots of vfolders. Evo broke for vfolders and vfolders of vfolders. to be clear, it is STILL broken. > > But, why was Evo so broken? This seems odd. As I mentioned, my previous > distro packages pre-releases of GNOME and Evolution, and I run > Evolution. I certainly don't think Evolution was broken for a > significant period around August-October last year. I feel sure I > would've remembered. Then clearly you don't really USE evolution. > Perhaps this is a case where, if there were more people running Rawhide > - like, fr'instance, whoever packages Evolution - it would've got fixed > faster... No. It's broken upstream too. > I suspect Rawhide is not as bad as many people think it is, and I > further suspect it could be even better if more people ran it. Is that > clearer? :) > Not really. I would like you to do this. Draft your thoughts for and about rawhide. Write them up in the wiki and then post a short summary of those thoughts to fedora-devel-list linking to the points in the wiki. Try to be concise and brief. Your emails are a bit scattered and I don't think you're improving the situation by your current plan of attack. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
