seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 13:57 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Since F-9 is still supported, isn't it a management failing to have >> allowed this to happen without a plan to make mock on F-9 work? > Then you're wrong: > yum update rpm\* yum\* > that should be about it. Oh? [tgl@rh2 ~]$ sudo yum update rpm\* yum\* ... Setting up Update Process No Packages marked for Update [tgl@rh2 ~]$ What was stated a couple days ago was that back-porting the hash changes into pre-F10 RPM versions was completely impractical. Has that been rethought? regards, tom lane -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
