On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:40 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 19:35 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> Are we ready to consider a brand new RPM version for F11, amidst all this >> mass-rebuild-for-strong-hash chaos and just days to go to development >> freeze? >> >> We just put out first rpm 4.7.0 beta: >> http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-announce/2009-February/000016.html. >> This is nothing like the 4.4.2.x -> 4.6.0 leap-of-faith upgrade last year >> but it's still non-trivial amount of changes to get the kind of memory use >> and performance improvements that 4.7.0 has, which is why it's not just >> 4.6.1. >> >> The wording of Fedora Feature policy pretty explicitly singles out each >> RPM upgrade to be a Feature... I would like to hear a preliminary opinion >> on it: if everybody is going to be an outright "NO!" then I'm not going to >> waste my time with writing up a Feature page. If it's "maybe" or "it >> depends" then ok, will submit as a feature in time for tomorrows FESCo >> meeting. >> >> So, should I bother with a RPM 4.7 feature page or not? > > > Roll it in for F11 beta and let's see how much breaks. + 1 We could still revert to 4.6 if it really breaks stuff so go ahead ;) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
