On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 19:35 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Are we ready to consider a brand new RPM version for F11, amidst all this > mass-rebuild-for-strong-hash chaos and just days to go to development > freeze? > > We just put out first rpm 4.7.0 beta: > http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-announce/2009-February/000016.html. > This is nothing like the 4.4.2.x -> 4.6.0 leap-of-faith upgrade last year > but it's still non-trivial amount of changes to get the kind of memory use > and performance improvements that 4.7.0 has, which is why it's not just > 4.6.1. > > The wording of Fedora Feature policy pretty explicitly singles out each > RPM upgrade to be a Feature... I would like to hear a preliminary opinion > on it: if everybody is going to be an outright "NO!" then I'm not going to > waste my time with writing up a Feature page. If it's "maybe" or "it > depends" then ok, will submit as a feature in time for tomorrows FESCo > meeting. > > So, should I bother with a RPM 4.7 feature page or not? Roll it in for F11 beta and let's see how much breaks. Thanks, -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
