On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 18:20 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:38 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > I'm sorry, I thought you had said F10. Not F9. > > > > In F10 it's available. > > > > And no - I don't think it is unreasonable to ask our developers and > > maintainers to be on something vaguely recent. And if they can't be for > > whatever reason it's not crazy for them to run it in a xen or kvm > > instance. > > It would be nice to have everyone who works on Rawhide, work *from* > Rawhide. I suspect this would make people generally less keen to break > stuff. =) That's precisely why it's not practical to use Rawhide as a day-to-day platform. I know others will disagree and that's fine, but I long since switched back to a stable Fedora 9/10 setup. It's tough enough ever getting a rawhide that will install, let alone not break randomly. KVM is great at letting one poke safely at stuff. Jon. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
