On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 17:42 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Effectively this means: Only a single sponsor needs to trust the > particular person to make him a proven packager, no matter how many > other sponsors disagree with that decision. IMO this requirement is > weaker than a given number of packages. > After he was sponsored the new proven packager can sponsor as many other > "pseudo-proven" packagers as he wants, even if they are not trustworthy. > Other sponsors have no way to prevent this, so I'm pretty sure we'll end > up with a large number of proven packagers again pretty soon. > > Or am I mistaken here? No, that's one view of it. It's just a proposal, you're welcome to suggest changes or make your own proposal like Robert did. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
