Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Le Jeu 29 janvier 2009 16:00, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :

> Please. Instead of antagonizing each other,  it would be useful to add
> information on what he doesn't know about.

Well, if it needs to be written publicly, a responsive upstream who is
also a Fedora packager and that can push fixes to core libraries in
Fedora as needed (and check we do not miss anything) is a major boon.

Not only Behdad is a responsive upstream for his own stuff but he's
also often pushed fixes for other projects whose canonical upstream
had postponed fixing indefinitely.

The rpm side of packaging is important, but mature packages do not
have a spec that changes every month and do not need an rpm expert to
maintain. Being able to fix the packaged stuff has more value than
understanding rpm arcanes.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux