Le Jeu 29 janvier 2009 15:55, Rex Dieter a écrit : > > Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >>> I'd have to say the chances of this are extremely unlikely. I'm >>> much >>> more inclined to propose that we drop texlive altogether. >> >> No TeX? >> If concrete licensing issues are found by somebody, of course those >> need to be addressed > > +1 > > Why is a license audit is blocking an update? I don't think it's blocking, IIRC texlive 2008 also demands different packaging, and there is a lack of people to do both the technical *and* the legal work. Of course new modular packaging of TEX would take care of both issues, if enough packagers could be found to submit packages for each part of TEX, checking its licensing at the same time. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
