On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:58 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 28.01.2009, 20:25 -0500 schrieb Brian Pepple: > > > This is all a moot point now though, since a couple of weeks ago FESCo > > approved a proposal to reset the initial seeding of the provenpackager > > group with Packaging Sponsors, and Jesse has made a proposal(1) on > > guidelines for approving someone to the provenpackager group. > > > > 1. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg01573.html > > > > IMO this is not a moot point at all, because even after the group was > reset, there are people in there that I don't want to see there. > > For example I just found out that one of the people I sponsor is proven > packager. Of course I do trust him, otherwise I would not have sponsored > him, but I doubt that 2 packages (!) and 3 months of experience are > enough for a proven packager. Umm, it is moot, since the *reset* hasn't actually occurred yet. If the person your referring to, isn't a Package sponsor he will not be a provenpackager in the reseed. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
