On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 06:07 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I wouldn't. Let's not make Fedora a bureaucracy like Debian stable. It would > immensely reduce its usefulness. People who don't want non-criticial > updates should be using CentOS, not Fedora. There is a big difference between critical only updates and what I would rather see done in Fedora. I'd like to see something closer to bugfix only and self contained minor enhancements. Major changes and wide reaching changes are very destabilizing and when you release say F10 with a set of software that acts one way, maybe even document it, then suddenly change the way that software works in an update, what does that do to the documentation, any possible training, or any actual meaning to the "release"? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
