James Antill wrote:
> ...if you are just asking nicely then #1 and #2 create a feedback loop
> which perpetuates the current updates firehose, if we want to do this we
> need to start forcing updates to not happen (ie. policy saying that
> updates _won't_ happen unless they qualify under XYZ).
> Maybe we could introduce this with usable KOPERS, so people can put
> their updates/non-critical-fixes into those repos.
>
> And as a Fedora user, an upstream developer and a Fedora packager ... I
> would welcome a policy to that effect.
I wouldn't. Let's not make Fedora a bureaucracy like Debian stable. It would
immensely reduce its usefulness. People who don't want non-criticial
updates should be using CentOS, not Fedora.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
