On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think what people really want is 'updates that fix the things that are > already broken' but not 'updates that break something new'. Can you come up > with a way to 'crowdsource' this statistic? Perhaps an optional poll where > people could rate the health of their system and individual apps, preferably > tied somehow to the smolt hardware reports so someone could see how the > current updates run on hardware like their own or which update triggered a > flurry of problems. Or maybe this could be automated - but the absence of > problem reports for an update could mean that no machines survived to send > them... Uhm.... in order to get "crowdsource" stats.. which will help you prevent the releasing of updates to the crowd...there has to be a crowd of people using the updates. How do yuou get feedback from the crowd without exposing the crowd to the updates? -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
