Re: Adobe Releases 64bit Flash Plugin for Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Dennis J. <dennisml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But that's the point. For quite a few people browser stability actually
*decreases* when nspluginwrapper is installed.

No... your browser lives... the flash plugin dies.

Without the wrapper... if the flash plugin does something crash-worthy
it crashes firefox completely. The way the wrapper works..flash
dies..the browser lives.

-jef


nspluginwrapper development is still important. This is because nspluginwrapper runs plugins in a separate process, enabling the browser to survive inevitable plugin bugs, and also the possibility of additional security through security policy isolation of that separate process. Fedora 8+ has run all plugins, even native 32bit-on-32bit, wrapped in nspluginwrapper for this purpose.

https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nspluginwrapper-d...
nspluginwrapper development discussion here. Please report your problems running the latest nspluginwrapper (currently 1.1.4) here. Gwenole is very good about responding to reports, often with patches to try.

If you don't want to deal with reporting bugs, you are free to remove nspluginwrapper. But then you have to live with the browser crashes.

http://macromedia.mplug.org/
I maintain a list of tips and workarounds to workaround Flash problems here.

Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux