Re: Adobe Releases 64bit Flash Plugin for Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/11/18 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 14:21 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Should nspluginwrapper be banned from wrapping this?  If so, should
>> this be included in flash-plugin.spec?
>
> Oh, I'm pretty sure you still want to keep flash separated from your
> browser, regardless of the arch.

Not according to the developer of the 64bit plugin.

"
Talking about nspluginwrapper: I strongly suggest not to use it. I
know that some distros are thinking of even wrapping 64-bit plugins
including Ubuntu with the thought that it will improve security and
stability of the browser. This is a very bad idea in the state
nspluginwrapper is in today. We have done some internal testing and
discovered that several features in the Flash Player are broken when
the plugin is wrapped. More importantly performance and user
experience is pretty bad when the plugin is wrapped. Why? Lots of data
needs to be transfered through IPC channels. I hope that browser
vendors will eventually come up with a better architecture to wrap
plugins without sacrificing performance, stability and functionality.
"
http://www.kaourantin.net/2008/11/64-bits.html


I am not advocating one way or another, just wanted to get the voice
out of one of the few who really knows what is going on behind the
plugin.

--Brennan Ashton

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux