Re: F11 Proposal: Stabilization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 17:16 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I think what people really want is 'updates that fix the things that are 
> already broken' but not 'updates that break something new'.  Can you 
> come up with a way to 'crowdsource' this statistic?  Perhaps an optional 
> poll where people could rate the health of their system and individual 
> apps, preferably tied somehow to the smolt hardware reports so someone 
> could see how the current updates run on hardware like their own or 
> which update triggered a flurry of problems.  Or maybe this could be 
> automated - but the absence of problem reports for an update could mean 
> that no machines survived to send them...

This is the role that bodhi karma is trying to play.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux