Re: starting Fedora Server SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Katz wrote:
Much of the work going from NM 0.6 -> 0.7 has been around things like
multiple interfaces up at once, static configs and system settings.  All
of which are things which matter far more for your typical server than a
desktop.

What typical server tasks aren't possible without NM? Will it do vlan trunk management making it possible to individually restrict users, applications, or virtual machines to specific vlans? Will it do dynamic multicast routing? If it offers new features instead of just a different way of configuring that things already possible the change might make sense.

Lots of things in a modern system are far removed from the stuff a unix
sysadmin has traditionally dealt with.  That doesn't make it necessarily
"bad".  And as Seth pointed out, this "all new is bad" or "all new is
good" dichotomy is a part of the problem

But if a system claiming to be new/better can't provide more or less exact emulation of the system it wants to replace, it probably really isn't better.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux