Re: starting Fedora Server SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Seth Vidal wrote:


On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, shmuel siegel wrote:

Bill Nottingham wrote:
The problem is that we listened to the complaint about solar being
installed by default, and fixed the bug before we released?


In this thread, the shock was just too much to bear.


Don't be hateful, that's not cool.

-sv

Sorry if it came across as that. I was trying to be funny. I guess I should have added a smiley. Interestingly enough, every time I get frustrated about comments being ignored on this list, along comes a message like Bill's announcement that they took criticism seriously and fixed the issue. I need things like that to encourage me to follow some of these long threads dealing with fundamental issues.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux