On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It uses ANY memory. That's more than is reasonable considering that the > former solution (ifconfig) uses none. NM and ifconfig are not comparable. Now I think saying that NM shouldn't use very much in the way of resources in the static routing case is a reasonable request; certainly with the push for virtualization and running lots of OS instances it makes sense. But it's just not reasonable to say "ANY" memory; that's not a reasonable constraint to operate under. We're trying to build an operating system; that necessitates adding APIs and features, for example network status change notification which is useful everywhere. It's perfectly fine though if someone's "create mediawiki appliance image" tool strips out stuff; but we should be moving the core OS to be more unified and featureful in general. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
