On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Colin Walters wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> You might notice that all of the above are features that are good for >>> developers working on enhancing other software and good for desktop users >>> but not so much features that a sysadmin worried only about keeping >>> systems >>> running and using as few resources as possible will care about. >> >> If any part of the core freedesktop.org stack uses an unreasonable >> amount of memory, please file a bug and we will fix it. > > It uses ANY memory. That's more than is reasonable considering that the > former solution (ifconfig) uses none. > > Colin, let me very clear, I think what NM does for the desktop is very good, > indeed. I like not having to fiddle around to make WEP stuff work using > iwconfig anymore. I appreciate what's been achieved. > > That doesn't make it a more useful thing on a server. +1 jerry -- There's plenty of youth in America - it's time we find the "fountain of smart". -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
