Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What does that mean for distributions that don't use RPM?
Is a Fedora mailinglist really the best place to have an informed
discussion on how non-RPM based distros deal with the requirements of
the LSB? The fact that you are asking this question may indicate that
this is a very good time to perhaps stop talking and to take a step
back to do a baseline assessment concerning what the LSB actually
mandates.
-jef"
http://packages.debian.org/etch/lsb-core
depends on: http://packages.debian.org/etch/alien
depends on: http://packages.debian.org/etch/rpm
"spaleta
According to this,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Standard_Base#Criticism
debian might not be the best place either. If it has to install rpms it
already misses the point of being distribution-agnostic.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
